Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2381/40648
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYan, Guoli-
dc.contributor.authorMeng, Zhu-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Nina-
dc.contributor.authorHe, Liyuan-
dc.contributor.authorPaterson, Kevin B.-
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-29T11:08:48Z-
dc.date.issued2017-06-07-
dc.identifier.citationQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2017, pp. 1-20en
dc.identifier.issn1747-0218-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17470218.2017.1339718en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2381/40648-
dc.descriptionThe file associated with this record is under embargo until 12 months after publication, in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. The full text may be available through the publisher links provided above.en
dc.description.abstractThe irrelevant speech effect (ISE) refers to the impairment of visual information processing by background speech. Prior research on the ISE has focused on short-term memory for visually-presented word lists. The present research extends this work by using measurements of eye movements to examine effects of irrelevant background speech during Chinese reading. This enabled an examination of the ISE for a language in which access to semantic representations is not strongly mediated by phonology. Participants read sentences while exposed to meaningful irrelevant speech, meaningless speech (scrambled meaningful speech) or silence. A target word of high or low lexical frequency was embedded in each sentence. The results show that meaningful, but not meaningless, background speech produced increased re-reading. In addition, the appearance of a normal word frequency effect, characterised by longer fixation times on low compared to high frequency words, was delayed when meaningful or meaningless speech was present in the background. These findings show that irrelevant background speech can disrupt normal processes of reading comprehension and, in addition, that background noise can interfere with the early processing of words. The findings add to evidence showing that normal reading processes can be disrupted by environmental noise such as irrelevant background speech.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis (Routledge)en
dc.relation.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28590881-
dc.rightsCopyright © 2017, Taylor & Francis (Routledge). Deposited with reference to the publisher’s open access archiving policy.en
dc.subjectBackground speechen
dc.subjectChinese readingen
dc.subjectEye movements during readingen
dc.subjectIrrelevant speech effectsen
dc.titleEffects of Irrelevant Background Speech on Eye Movements during Reading.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/17470218.2017.1339718-
dc.identifier.eissn1747-0226-
dc.description.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.description.versionPost-printen
dc.type.subtypeJournal Article-
pubs.organisational-group/Organisationen
pubs.organisational-group/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCESen
pubs.organisational-group/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/MBSP Non-Medical Departmentsen
pubs.organisational-group/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/MBSP Non-Medical Departments/Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviouren
pubs.organisational-group/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/Themesen
pubs.organisational-group/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/Themes/Neuroscience & Behaviouren
pubs.organisational-group/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/Themes/RESULTen
dc.rights.embargodate2018-06-07-
dc.dateaccepted2017-05-18-
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, Dept. of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ISE-QJEP-revision-FINAL.pdfPost-review (final submitted author manuscript)256.78 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.