Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFontaine, Roger-
dc.contributor.authorSalvano-Pardieu, Veronique-
dc.contributor.authorRenoux, Pierre-
dc.contributor.authorPulford, Briony D.-
dc.identifier.citationAging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 2004, 11 (4), pp. 379-394.en_GB
dc.description.abstractThe algebraic structure of the blame schema of moral judgement (using Anderson‟s method, Integration Information Theory) was studied in a group of 18 patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and a control group. The effects of Intent and Consequences of the action on the propensity to apportion blame were analysed, as well as the level of seriousness of different situations. Results show no significant differences between the AD and control groups in their algebraic structure, as they combine information about Intent and Consequence in the same way, but the AD group are less capable of taking seriousness into account when apportioning blame. The characteristics of the two cognitive processes that appear to be involved and their resistance to Alzheimer‟s disease are discussed.en_GB
dc.publisherPsychology Pressen_GB
dc.rightsThis is the author's final draft of the paper published as Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 2004, 11 (4), pp. 379 - 394. The final published version is available at, Doi: 10.1080/13825580490521313-
dc.titleJudgement of Blame in Alzheimer's Disease Sufferers.en_GB
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, School of Psychology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fontaine draft 2004.pdf406.91 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.