Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Deliberative Democracy in Action: A Case Study of Animal Protection
Authors: Garner, Robert
First Published: 30-Mar-2018
Publisher: Lund University
Citation: Politics and Animals, 2018, 4
Abstract: This article provides a case study of deliberative forums concerned with animal protection issues. It is argued that, whilst the deliberative exercises reviewed had relatively little impact on policy makers, there was some evidence of an attitude shift amongst the participants, and these tended to be in the direction of support for greater protection for animals. However, there are three important caveats to this conclusion. First, the opinion shifts documented all came about as a result of the provision of information which, strictly speaking, can be separated from deliberation. Secondly, there was no evidence of a shift in values; thirdly, and perhaps not surprisingly, shifts of opinion were less likely to occur when partisans were involved.
Version: Post-print
Status: Peer-reviewed
Type: Journal Article
Rights: Copyright © the authors, 2018. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, Dept. of Politics and International Relations

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
deliberative democracy in practice.docxPost-review (final submitted author manuscript)64.66 kBUnknownView/Open
deliberative+democracy+in+practice.pdfPost-review (final submitted author manuscript)306.95 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.