Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2381/42429
Title: Archaeology is process
Authors: Harris, Oliver
First Published: 11-May-2018
Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Citation: Archaeological Dialogues, 2018, 25 (1), pp. 34-38 (5)
Abstract: Assaf Nativ has written an interesting and, I think, important paper. It raises critical issues around the ontological status of ‘the archaeological’ and indeed about the purpose and aims of archaeology as a discipline. These are clearly topics that require consideration and critical analysis. His arguments are provocative, in the best sense, in that they will lead us to reflect on some of the basic foundations of what we believe archaeology to be. Such consideration is certainly necessary to disciplinary health. That said, and after some hefty reflection of my own, I have concluded that I disagree with much of the paper's argument. In the space afforded to me I aim to set out why.
DOI Link: 10.1017/S1380203818000028
ISSN: 1380-2038
eISSN: 1478-2294
Links: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/archaeological-dialogues/article/archaeology-is-process/1FDE3DA9B94F7CA90528C590631F9B3E
http://hdl.handle.net/2381/42429
Version: Post-print
Status: Peer-reviewed
Type: Journal Article
Rights: Copyright © 2018, Cambridge University Press (CUP). Deposited with reference to the publisher’s open access archiving policy. (http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved)
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, School of Archaeology and Ancient History

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Harris+comment+draft+2.pdfPost-review (final submitted author manuscript)148.15 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.