Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: From Judge Judy to Judge Rinder and Judge Geordie: Humour, emotion and ‘televisual legal consciousness’
Authors: Wood, Helen K.
First Published: 2018
Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Citation: International Journal of Law in Context, 2018, in press
Abstract: This article attempts to counter legal studies’ common reading of court TV shows by starting with an understanding of them as television, rather comparing them to ‘real courts’. It analyses two recent examples of British court TV shows, Judge Rinder (ITV 2014-) and Judge Geordie (MTV 2015), to draw out how the text’s form establishes particular kinds of ‘televisual legal consciousness’. Judge Rinder’s daytime address and his camped authority allow for a frame in which humour can disarm conflict and reveal wider political injustice. Judge Geordie’s irreverent upturning of the judged into judge, draws upon the registers of youth reality television to privilege affect and emotion. In staging some of the tensions between law’s masculine rationality and popular culture’s feminine emotionality, these shows enact their interdependence. Such an analysis which includes attention to form, address and genre, allows us a deeper exploration of the relationship between television, law and the everyday.
ISSN: 1744-5523
eISSN: 1744-5531
Version: Post-print
Status: Peer-reviewed
Type: Journal Article
Rights: Copyright © 2018, Cambridge University Press (CUP). Deposited with reference to the publisher’s open access archiving policy. (
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, Dept. of Media and Communication

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Rinder and Geordie - revised refs.pdfPost-review (final submitted author manuscript)412.83 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.