Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Learning to be interprofessional through the use of reflective portfolios?
Authors: Domac, Sezer
Anderson, Elizabeth S.
Smith, Roger
First Published: 12-May-2016
Publisher: Taylor & Francis (Routledge)
Citation: Social Work Education, 2016, 35 (5), pp. 530-546 (17)
Abstract: Learning portfolios are used extensively in health and social care. There is evidence of their value as a tool to consolidate learning although limited information is available regarding their use in social work education. This study explores the use of a portfolio to encourage social work students to reflect on their interprofessional learning (IPL). The portfolio offers a means of demonstrating professionalism concerning knowledge, skills and attitudes in the context of collaborative practice. The findings of this research suggest that qualifying students were largely capable of reflecting on their development of interprofessional competence after attending specific IPL events, which were part of a wider programme. Social work students found reflective writing difficult, although this improved over time. In particular students struggled to write about skills and attitudes. Students perceived the portfolio to be a good way to assess their progress and believed this helped them to engage with their learning and make meaning through reflection and analysis. They appreciated that IPL and feedback from their assessments had advanced their abilities for self-analysis; despite needing help with reflective writing, they felt better prepared for ongoing use of reflection in their professional development, and in ‘working together’.
DOI Link: 10.1080/02615479.2016.1178717
ISSN: 0261-5479
eISSN: 1470-1227
Version: Post-print
Status: Peer-reviewed
Type: Journal Article
Rights: Copyright © 2016, Taylor & Francis (Routledge). Deposited with reference to the publisher’s open access archiving policy. (
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, Dept. of Medical and Social Care Education

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
18861.pdfPost-review (final submitted author manuscript)664.93 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.