Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStoner, MJ-
dc.contributor.authorMahajan, P-
dc.contributor.authorBressan, S-
dc.contributor.authorLam, SHF-
dc.contributor.authorChumpitazi, CE-
dc.contributor.authorKornblith, AE-
dc.contributor.authorLinakis, SW-
dc.contributor.authorRoland, D-
dc.contributor.authorFreedman, SB-
dc.contributor.authorNigrovic, LE-
dc.contributor.authorDenninghoff, K-
dc.contributor.authorIshimine, P-
dc.contributor.authorKuppermann, N-
dc.identifier.citationAcad Emerg Med, 2018en
dc.descriptionThe file associated with this record is under embargo until 12 months after publication, in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. The full text may be available through the publisher links provided above.en
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Pediatric emergency care research networks have evolved substantially over the past 2 decades. Some networks are specialized in specific areas (e.g. sedation, simulation) while others study a variety of medical and traumatic conditions. Given the increased collaboration between pediatric emergency research networks, the logical next step is the development of a research priorities agenda to guide global research in emergency medical services for children (EMSC). OBJECTIVES: An international group of pediatric emergency network research leaders was assembled to develop a list of research priorities for future collaborative endeavors within and between pediatric emergency research networks. METHODS: Before an in-person meeting, we used a modified Delphi approach to achieve consensus around pediatric emergency research network topic priorities. Further discussions took place on May 15, 2018 in Indianapolis, Indiana at the Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM) consensus conference "Aligning the Pediatric Emergency Medicine Research Agenda to Reduce Health Outcome Gaps." Here, a group of 40 organizers and participants met in a 90-minute "breakout" session to review and further develop the initial priorities. RESULTS: We reached consensus on five clinical research priorities that would benefit from collaboration among the existing and future emergency networks focused on EMSC: sepsis, trauma, respiratory conditions, pharmacology of emergency conditions and mental health emergencies. Furthermore, we identified non-clinical research priorities categorized under the domains of technology, knowledge translation and organization/administration of pediatric emergency care. CONCLUSION: The identification of pediatric emergency care network research priorities within the domains of clinical care, technology, knowledge translation and organization/administration of EMSC will facilitate and help focus collaborative research within and among research networks globally. Engagement of essential stakeholders including EMSC researchers, policy makers, patients, and their care givers will stimulate advances in the delivery of emergency care to children around the globe.en
dc.rightsCopyright © 2018, Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. Deposited with reference to the publisher’s open access archiving policy. (
dc.titlePediatric Emergency Care Research Networks: A Research Agenda.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.type.subtypeJournal Article-
pubs.organisational-group/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCESen
pubs.organisational-group/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/School of Medicineen
pubs.organisational-group/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/School of Medicine/Department of Health Sciencesen
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, Dept. of Health Sciences

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Pediatric Emergency Care Research Networks A Research Agenda Final Submission.pdfPost-review (final submitted author manuscript)1.63 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.