Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2381/43274
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSyriopoulou, E-
dc.contributor.authorMozumder, SI-
dc.contributor.authorRutherford, MJ-
dc.contributor.authorLambert, PC-
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-08T10:49:19Z-
dc.date.available2019-02-08T10:49:19Z-
dc.date.issued2018-11-12-
dc.identifier.citationCancer Epidemiology, 2018, 58, pp. 17-24en
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187778211830328X?via%3Dihuben
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2381/43274-
dc.descriptionSupplementary material related to this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2018.10.017.en
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Flexible parametric survival models (FPMs) are commonly used in epidemiology. These are preferred as a wide range of hazard shapes can be captured using splines to model the log-cumulative hazard function and can include time-dependent effects for more flexibility. An important issue is the number of knots used for splines. The reliability of estimates are assessed using English data for 10 cancer types and the use of online interactive graphs to enable a more comprehensive sensitivity analysis at the control of the user is demonstrated. METHODS: Sixty FPMs were fitted to each cancer type with varying degrees of freedom to model the baseline excess hazard and the main and time-dependent effect of age. For each model, we obtained age-specific, age-group and internally age-standardised relative survival estimates. The Akaike Information Criterion and Bayesian Information Criterion were also calculated and comparative estimates were obtained using the Ederer II and Pohar Perme methods. Web-based interactive graphs were developed to present results. RESULTS: Age-standardised estimates were very insensitive to the exact number of knots for the splines. Age-group survival is also stable with negligible differences between models. Age-specific estimates are less stable especially for the youngest and oldest patients, of whom there are very few, but for most scenarios perform well. CONCLUSION: Although estimates do not depend heavily on the number of knots, too few knots should be avoided, as they can result in a poor fit. Interactive graphs engage researchers in assessing model sensitivity to a wide range of scenarios and their use is highly encouraged.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by Cancer Research UK [Grant number C1483/A18262].en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.relation.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30439603-
dc.rightsCopyright © the authors, 2018. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en
dc.subjectCanceren
dc.subjectFlexible parametric survival modelen
dc.subjectInteractive graphsen
dc.subjectRelative survivalen
dc.subjectRestricted cubic splinesen
dc.titleRobustness of individual and marginal model-based estimates: A sensitivity analysis of flexible parametric models.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.canep.2018.10.017-
dc.identifier.eissn1877-783X-
dc.identifier.piiS1877-7821(18)30328-X-
dc.description.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.description.versionPublisher Versionen
dc.type.subtypeJournal Article-
pubs.organisational-group/Organisationen
pubs.organisational-group/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCESen
pubs.organisational-group/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/School of Medicineen
pubs.organisational-group/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/School of Medicine/Department of Health Sciencesen
pubs.organisational-group/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/Themesen
pubs.organisational-group/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/Themes/Populationen
dc.dateaccepted2018-10-30-
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, Dept. of Health Sciences

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S187778211830328X-main.pdfPublished (publisher PDF)1.05 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.