Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2381/43627
Title: Increased blood pressure variability following acute stroke is associated with poor long-term outcomes: a systematic review.
Authors: Appiah, KOB
Patel, M
Panerai, RB
Robinson, TG
Haunton, VJ
First Published: 11-Feb-2019
Publisher: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
Citation: Blood Pressure Monitoring, 2019, 24 (2) pp. 67–73
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Blood pressure variability (BPV) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) may be of prognostic significance. However, methodological heterogeneity of studies may contribute to inconsistent findings, and study findings are therefore not readily comparable. We investigated study methodologies which have assessed the long-term outcomes (≥7 days) of BPV post-AIS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The literature search was conducted in OVID Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science following a predefined search strategy. Two reviewers independently assessed study eligibility and quality, and source data were extracted. RESULTS: Of 2044 studies identified, 19 observational studies and one case-control study were included; seven studies were additionally included. Twenty-two studies obtained good risk of bias ratings. Key findings were methodological heterogeneity and significant variability in the reporting of key criteria. Twenty-four studies reported intervals between blood pressure assessments; although 19 studies reported the monitoring device used, only eight studies reported the number of blood pressure measurements taken per visit. The majority measured supine blood pressure (n=13), and eight studies reported whether this was in the hemiparetic or unaffected arm. Sixteen studies defined BPV using SD and seven studies used only a single blood pressure parameter to quantify BPV. Increased BPV was associated with poorer neurological and functional outcomes, and death (n=23); other unfavorable outcomes included irregularly shaped lacunar infarcts, and impaired cognition (n=3). CONCLUSION: Methodological heterogeneity is frequently observed in studies, primarily because of incomplete study reporting. However, increased BPV is associated with adverse long-term outcomes. There is a need for prospective studies investigating BPV post-AIS to report full methodologies according to standardized criteria.
DOI Link: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000366
eISSN: 1473-5725
Links: https://journals.lww.com/bpmonitoring/Abstract/2019/04000/Increased_blood_pressure_variability_following.4.aspx
http://hdl.handle.net/2381/43627
Embargo on file until: 11-Feb-2020
Version: Post-print
Status: Peer-reviewed
Type: Journal Article
Rights: Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health. Deposited with reference to the publisher’s open access archiving policy. (http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved)
Description: The file associated with this record is under embargo until 12 months after publication, in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. The full text may be available through the publisher links provided above.
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, Dept. of Cardiovascular Sciences

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Increased+BPV+and+Outcome+Systematic+Review+15+Aug+2018+TR_VH.pdfPost-review (final submitted author manuscript)427.17 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.