Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Addressing treatment switching in Health Technology Assessment
Authors: Boucher, Rebecca H.
Supervisors: Abrams, Keith
Lambert, Paul
Award date: 28-Jun-2019
Presented at: University of Leicester
Abstract: Background: Sometimes individual patient level (IPD) must be reconstructed data from summary information when treatment switching has occurred (i.e. proportion of patients changed treatment arms during the course of a randomised control trial) to facilitate re-analysis when the IPD is unavailable. However, to re-analyse overall survival (OS), information is needed on the time to treatment switching; this can usually be approximated by time to progression (TTP). Therefore, the reconstructed data must include TTP and time to death for patients, estimated using an illness-death modelling framework. Methods: Here it is assumed only summary information of Progression-free survival (PFS) and OS are available. Using coordinates extracted from the Kaplan-Meier curves, the survival distributions are modelled. These are then combined with the PFS and OS risk tables, models for TTP, and estimates of the censoring distributions and post-progression survival (PPS) The data are then simulated and combined to obtain the underlying survival data. The correct proportion of treatment switchers is selected from those experiencing disease progression and the dataset analysed using a Rank Preserving Structural Failure Time Model (RPSFTM) to account for treatment switching. Multiple datasets are created from these models; each is analysed separately and the results averaged over to obtain a final point estimate. Results: The simulated data are, on average, broadly representative of the original IPD, both in terms of the reported summary statistics and the RPSFTM analysis. Conclusions: This application demonstrates the success with which this method can be used to reconstruct the data, and achieve an appropriate re-analysis for treatment switching, fulfilling a fundamental gap in the research.
Type: Thesis
Level: Doctoral
Qualification: PhD
Rights: Copyright © the author. All rights reserved.
Appears in Collections:Leicester Theses
Theses, Dept. of Health Sciences

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2019BoucherRHPhD.pdfThesis14.65 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.