Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2381/45506
Title: Geographical variation in rates of surgical treatment for female stress urinary incontinence in England: a national cohort study.
Authors: Mamza, JB
Geary, RS
El-Hamamsy, D
Cromwell, DA
Duckett, J
Monga, A
Toozs-Hobson, P
Mahmood, T
Wilson, A
Tincello, DG
van der Meulen, JH
Gurol Urganci, I
First Published: 28-Aug-2019
Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group
Citation: BMJ Open 2019;9:e029878
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To examine geographic variation in use of surgery for female stress urinary incontinence (SUI), mainly midurethral mesh tape insertions, in the English National Health Service (NHS). DESIGN: National cohort study. SETTING: NHS hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: 27 997 women aged 20 years or older who had a first SUI surgery in an English NHS Hospital between April 2013 and March 2016 and a diagnosis of SUI at the same time as the procedure. METHODS: Multilevel Poisson regression was used to adjust for geographic differences in age, ethnicity, prevalence of long-term illness and socioeconomic deprivation. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Rate of surgery for SUI per 100 000 women/year at two geographic levels: Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG; n=209) and Sustainability and Transformation Partnership (STP; n=44). RESULTS: The rate of surgery for SUI was 40 procedures per 100 000 women/year. Risk-adjusted rates ranged from 20 to 106 procedures per 100 000 women/year across CCGs and 24 to 69 procedures per 100 000 women/year across the STP areas. These regional differences were only partially explained by demographic characteristics as adjustment reduced variance of surgery rates by 16% among the CCGs and 35% among the STPs. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial geographic variation exists in the use of surgery for female SUI in the English NHS, suggesting that women in some areas are more likely to be treated compared with women with the same condition in other areas. The variation reflects differences in how national guidelines are being interpreted in the context of the ongoing debate about the safety of SUI surgery.
DOI Link: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029878
eISSN: 2044-6055
Links: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/8/e029878
http://hdl.handle.net/2381/45506
Version: Publisher Version
Status: Peer-reviewed
Type: Journal Article
Rights: Copyright © the authors, 2019. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Description: Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available.
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, Dept. of Health Sciences

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Mamza et al BMJOpen 2019.pdfPublished (publisher PDF)1.38 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.