Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Compelling Parties to Judicial Early Neutral Evaluation but a Missed Opportunity for Mediation
Authors: Ahmed, Masood
Arslan, Fatma
First Published: 2019
Publisher: Sweet and Maxwell
Citation: Civil Justice Quarterly, 2019, In Press
Abstract: This note critically considers the recent case of Lomax v Lomax in which the Court of Appeal, reversing the decision at first instance, held that the courts could, as part of their case management powers, compel non-consenting parties to early neutral evaluation. Although the case concerned a particular form of alternative dispute resolution – judicial early neutral evaluation - the Court of Appeal decision represents a significant development in strengthening and further integrating ADR in general within the civil court process. It is argued that the Court of Appeal decision demonstrates an important and necessary judicial culture shift away from perceiving ADR as simply equating to mediation, and dispute resolution as merely consisting of a narrow two-stream system of mediation and litigation. The decisions reflect a wider understanding and application of those procedural concepts and this is to be encouraged across the judiciary. It is also argued that the rationale underpinning the Court of Appeal’s decision can justifiably be extended to apply to mediation so that, in appropriate cases, the courts can legitimately order parties to explore settlement through mediation. Finally, the Court of Appeal’s failure to take the opportunity to reappraise and finally dismiss the controversial decision in Halsey on the issue of ADR compulsion means that the current tensions and difficulties within the ADR jurisprudence will continue.
ISSN: 0261-9261
Links: TBA
Embargo on file until: 1-Jan-10000
Version: Post-print
Status: Peer-reviewed
Type: Journal Article
Rights: Copyright © 2019, Sweet and Maxwell. Deposited with reference to the publisher’s open access archiving policy. (
Description: The file associated with this record is under embargo until 12 months after publication, in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. The full text may be available through the publisher links provided above.
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, School of Law

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Lomax+paper+-+CJQ+-+Ahmed++Arslan+(FINAL+UPDATED)+25.9.19+(002).pdfPost-review (final submitted author manuscript)292.2 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.