Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorComber, Alexis J.-
dc.contributor.authorFisher, Peter F.-
dc.contributor.authorWadsworth, Richard A.-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Geographical Information Science, 18(7): 691-708.en_GB
dc.description.abstractSpatially coincident land cover information frequently varies due to technological and political variations. This is especially problematic for time-series analyses. We present an approach using expert expressions of how the semantics of different datasets relate to integrating temporal time series land cover information where the classification classes have fundamentally changed. We use LCMGB and LCM2000 as example data sets because of the extensive object based meta-data in the LCM2000. Inconsistencies between the two datasets can arise from random, gross and systematic error and from an actual change in land cover. Locales of possible land cover change are inferred by comparing characterisations derived from the semantic relations and meta-data. Field visits showed errors of omission to be 21% and errors of commission to be 28%, despite the accuracy limitations of the land cover information when compared to the field survey component of the Countryside Survey 2000.en_GB
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_GB
dc.titleIntegrating land cover data with different ontologies: identifying change from inconsistency.en_GB
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, Dept. of Geography

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
16a. comber_et_al_ijgis.pdf9.18 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.