Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2381/525
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorColman, Andrew M.-
dc.date.accessioned2007-07-20T09:38:20Z-
dc.date.available2007-07-20T09:38:20Z-
dc.date.issued2007-
dc.identifier.citationBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 2007, 30, p22-23en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2381/525-
dc.descriptionThis is the author's draft of an article published in Behavioral and Brain Sciences http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=BBSen
dc.description.abstractEven if game theory is broadened to encompass other-regarding preferences, it cannot adequately model all aspects of interactive decision making. Payoff dominance is an example of a phenomenon that can be adequately modeled only by departing radically from standard assumptions of decision theory and game theory – either the unit of agency or the nature of rationality.en
dc.format.extent27544 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen
dc.titleLove is not enough: Other-regarding preferences cannot explain payoff dominance in game theoryen
dc.typeArticleen
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, School of Psychology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Love is not enough.pdf26.9 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.