Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Equivocal Rulings on Expert Psychological and Psychiatric Evidence: Turning a muddle into a nonsense
Authors: Mackay, R.D.
Colman, Andrew M.
First Published: 1996
Publisher: Sweet & Maxwell
Citation: Criminal Law Review, 1996, pp.88-95.
Abstract: This article expands on a previous critical examination of the rule established in R. v. Turner and discusses more recent decisions regarding the admissibility of expert psychiatric and psychological evidence.
Type: Article
Description: This is the author's draft of an article published in Criminal Law Review by Sweet & Maxwell
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, School of Psychology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Equivocal Rulings on Expert Psychological.pdf66.28 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.