Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Meta-analysis of genetic studies using Mendelian randomization - a multivariate approach|
|Authors:||Thompson, John R.|
Abrams, Keith R.
Tobin, Martin D.
Riley, Richard D.
|Citation:||Statistics in Medicine, 2005, 24 (14), pp. 2241-2254.|
|Abstract:||In traditional epidemiological studies the association between phenotype (risk factor) and disease is often biased by confounding and reverse causation. As a person's genotype is assigned by a seemingly random process, genes are potentially useful instrumental variables for adjusting for such bias. This type of adjustment combines information on the genotype-disease association and the genotype-phenotype association to estimate the phenotype-disease association and has become known as Mendelian randomization. The information on genotype-disease and genotype-phenotype may well come from a meta-analysis. In such a synthesis, a multivariate approach needs to be used whenever some studies provide evidence on both the genotype-phenotype and genotype-disease associations. This paper presents two multivariate meta-analytical models, which differ in their treatment of the heterogeneities (between-study variances). Heterogeneities on the genotype-phenotype and genotype-disease associations may be highly correlated, but a multivariate model that parameterizes the heterogeneity directly is difficult to fit because that correlation is poorly estimated. We advocate an alternative model that treats the heterogeneities on genotype-phenotype and phenotype-disease as being independent. This model fits readily and implicitly defines the correlation between the heterogeneities on genotype-phenotype and genotype-disease. We show how either maximum likelihood or a Bayesian approach with vague prior distributions can be used to fit the alternative model.|
|Description:||This paper was published as Statistics in Medicine, 2005, 24 (14), pp. 2241-2254. It is available from http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/110491700/abstract. Doi: 10.1002/sim.2100|
Metadata only item
|Appears in Collections:||Published Articles, Dept. of Health Sciences|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.