Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2381/7694
Title: How not to assess probation performance: Constructing local reconviction rates
Authors: Hedderman, Carol
First Published: Jun-2009
Publisher: SAGE Publications, in association with NAPO, the Trade Union and Professional Association for Family Court and Probation Staff.
Citation: Probation Journal, 2009, 56 (2), pp. 111-127.
Abstract: Much of the responsibility for securing reductions in offending and reoffending is being devolved to local statutory services. It follows that robust and timely local measures for assessing reoffending must be created. To this end, for the last three years the National Offender Management Service has produced quarterly reconviction reports for individual probation areas based on `snapshots' (cross-sectional samples) of the supervision caseload. An independent examination of the data for the East Midlands Region reveals that the way cases have been selected and followed-up departs from the conventions employed in all previous (`longitudinal') reconviction studies in England and Wales. In particular, the `crosssectional' or snapshot approach led to the `at risk' period varying from one offender to another; and those on longer sentences stood a much greater than usual chance of appearing in several samples over time. This, together with other problems associated with not following a conventional longitudinal approach, leads to the conclusion that it would be unwise to use the quarterly figures produced thus far to draw conclusions about probation areas' performance.
DOI Link: 10.1177/0264550509103196
ISSN: 0264-5505
Links: http://prb.sagepub.com/content/56/2/111
http://hdl.handle.net/2381/7694
Type: Article
Rights: This is the author's final draft of the paper published as Probation Journal, 2009, 56 (2), pp. 111-127. The final version is available from http://prb.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/2/111. Doi: 10.1177/0264550509103196
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, Dept. of Criminology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
How not to assess probation performance.pdf241.17 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.