Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2381/8024
Title: Different methods, different wilds: Evaluating alternative mappings of wildness using fuzzy MCE and Dempster-Shafer MCE
Authors: Comber, Alexis J.
Carver, Steve
Fritz, Steffen
McMorran, Robert
Washtell, Justin
Fisher, Peter
First Published: 2-Dec-2009
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2010, 34 (2), pp. 142-152
Abstract: Different multi-criteria evaluation (MCE) approaches are applied to a fuzzy wildness mapping problem in Scotland. The result of fuzzy weighted linear combination and fuzzy order weighted averaging approaches are compared with the application of a Dempster-Shafer MCE. We discuss the implications of different approaches in light of decision making associated with suitability in a context where (i) suitability (wildness) may not be very well defined, (ii) the decision makers may not fully understand the informatics aspects associated with applying weights, but (iii) require decisions to be accountable and transparent. In such situations we suggest that the outputs of Dempster-Shafer MCE may be more appropriate than a fully fuzzy model of suitability.
DOI Link: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2009.10.006
ISSN: 0198-9715
Links: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0198971509000799
http://hdl.handle.net/2381/8024
Type: Article
Rights: This is the author’s final draft of the paper published as Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2010, 34 (2), pp. 142-152. The final published version is available at http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/304/description#description, Doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2009.10.006
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, Dept. of Geography

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1. Comber_et_al_prepub_CEUS.pdf821.71 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.