Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2381/8170
Title: Patient Preference for Surgical Method of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Postal Survey
Authors: Reise, J. A.
Sheldon, H.
Earnshaw, J.
Naylor, A. R.
Dick, F.
Powell, J. T.
Greenhalgh, R. M.
First Published: Jan-2010
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Patient preference for surgical method of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: postal survey. Reise JA, Sheldon H, Earnshaw J, Naylor AR, Dick F, Powell JT, Greenhalgh RM. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. Volume 39, Issue 1, January 2010, Pages 55-61.
Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To determine whether men with small abdominal aortic aneurysm have a preference between either endovascular or open aneurysm repair for future treatment. DESIGN: Prospective study of self-declared treatment preference following receipt of a validated patient information pack. PARTICIPANTS: Men aged 65-84 years (n=237) with asymptomatic aneurysm (4.0-5.4 cm) detected by population-based screening. METHODS: An unbiased, validated patient information pack and questionnaire were developed to conduct a postal survey. RESULTS: One hundred sixty seven participants (70%) returned a completed questionnaire; 24 (10%) did not respond at all. Initially, only 38 (23%) declared a treatment preference. After reading the information pack, 130 participants (80%) declared a treatment preference: 30 preferred open repair (18%), 77 endovascular repair (46%), 23 were happy with either option (14%) and only 34 remained without any preference (20%). Nearly all (92%) thought that the information pack had prepared them well for future discussions with clinicians and with no single feature identified as influencing the preference-making process, 66 respondents (40%) still opted to 'take the advice of the doctor'. CONCLUSION: The patient information pack facilitated the development of treatment preferences with endovascular repair being preferred to open repair. Nevertheless for patient-centred care, vascular centres must continue to safely provide both open and endovascular repair.
DOI Link: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.08.008
ISSN: 1078-5884
Links: http://hdl.handle.net/2381/8170
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078588409004407
Type: Article
Description: Metadata. Full text of this item is not currently available on the LRA.
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, Dept. of Cardiovascular Sciences

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.