Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
|dc.identifier.citation||Review of Social Economy, 2009, 67 (4), pp. 483-505||en_GB|
|dc.description||Full text of this item is not currently available on the LRA. The final published version is available at http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~db=all~content=g917702909, Doi: 10.1080/00346760802245383||en_GB|
|dc.description.abstract||Economists and policy-makers often present per capita gross domestic product (GDP) as by far the most significant indicator of economic well-being. Such measures are frequently adopted in making international comparisons, constructing time-series for particular countries and in studies of regional inequality. In this paper we challenge this view using a regional analysis of 2001 data focusing upon differences between London and the south-eastern regions, in comparison to the rest of Great Britain (GB). Initially GDP per capita is decomposed into the demographic and labour-market factors which generate it. Thereafter we broaden the notion of work-time used in productivity measures to include other necessary work-related activity, namely commuting. This leads to us to construct a new indicator which we call social productivity. Our conclusion is that our decomposition and notion of social productivity are both relevant in comparisons of regional well-being; in addition such methods may be used fruitfully in international and historical contexts.||en_GB|
|dc.publisher||Taylor & Francis (Routledge)||en_GB|
|dc.title||Economic Well-being and British Regions: The Problem with GDP Per Capita||en_GB|
|Appears in Collections:||Published Articles, School of Management|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.