Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
|dc.identifier.citation||Centre for Labour Market Studies, Working Paper 27||en_GB|
|dc.description||This paper was published as Working Paper 27 by the Centre for Labour Market Studies, University of Leicester. It is available from http://www.clms.le.ac.uk/research/wpapers.lasso||en_GB|
|dc.description||This paper is based on an Evaluation of the FORCE programme for the Task Force Human Resources, and a subsequent research action project on the Transferability of Training for DGXXII, undertaken by the author and other colleagues at the Evaluation and Development Review Unit, Tavistock Institute, London. See Stern and Turbin, 1994 and Turbin, 1995||-|
|dc.description||Metadata only entry||-|
|dc.description.abstract||Globalisation has provided an impetus to the borrowing of policies and ‘best practices’ between countries. This paper looks specifically at such borrowing in the field of Vocational Education and Training (VET). Using case study data drawn from a wider evaluation of a European Programme, it demonstrates some of the barriers encountered when attempting to transfer training principles, practices and delivery systems from one country to another. Whilst acknowledging the importance of ‘learning’ at a broader level, the paper argues that VET systems are embedded within a wider societal, institutional and cultural context that limits the success of transfer.||en_GB|
|dc.publisher||Centre for Labour Market Studies, University of Leicester||en_GB|
|dc.relation.ispartofseries||CLMS Working Paper||en_GB|
|dc.title||Policy Borrowing: Lessons from European Attempts to Transfer Training Practices||en_GB|
|Appears in Collections:||Reports, Centre for Labour Market Studies|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.