Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Voices from the European court of human rights|
|Authors:||White, Robin C.A.|
|Citation:||Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 2009, 27(2), pp.167-189.|
|Abstract:||The future of the Strasbourg Court, a large and very busy court, has been the subject f much discussion. The capacity of the Court to handle the volume of admissible cases remains a significant challenge, and is made more difficult by the absence of ratification by all contracting parties of Protocol No. 14. Ten years after the establishment of the new permanent court, nine judges reflected on aspects of the work of the Court and the challenges it faces. The main purpose of this article is to put into the public domain some extracts from those interviews, which cover a wide range of issues. The voices from the Court are offered in the context of an argument that the contracting parties need to recognise the constitutional nature of the Strasbourg Court, and should be, but probably are not, willing to change the admissibility rules to make determination by the Strasbourg Court a matter of discretion rather than entitlement.|
|Description:||The full-text of this article is not currently available on the LRA. The orginal published version is available at: http://www.nqhr.net/|
|Appears in Collections:||Published Articles, School of Law|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.