Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Separate opinions in the European court of human rights|
|Authors:||White, Robin C.A.|
|Publisher:||Oxford University Press|
|Citation:||Human Rights Law Review, 2009, 9(1), pp.37-60.|
|Abstract:||Separate opinions, both concurring and dissenting, have been a feature of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights since its earliest days, but detailed studies of their incidence and impact have until recently been sparse. This article, based on an AHRC-funded research study, offers a survey of the research literature and describes the outcome of its own consideration of such opinions. The use of separate opinions in the European Court of Human Rights is significant, but the incidence of sole dissents by national judges is very low. It would appear that the main determining factor in the writing of a separate opinion is judicial temperament. There is some evidence that the background of judges prior to their election to the Court has some influence on their approach to writing separate opinions. The Court, however, demonstrates high levels of collegiality and the use of separate opinions contributes to the transparency of its decision-making.|
|Description:||The full-text of this article is not currently available on the LRA. The original published version is available on the publisher's webiste: http://hrlr.oxfordjournals.org/content/9/1.toc DOI: 10.1093/hrlr/ngn033|
|Appears in Collections:||Published Articles, School of Law|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.