Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Courtroom questioning: The influence on witness accuracy and fact-finder perception
Authors: Vogt, Dieter
Award date: 2009
Abstract: The adversarial nature of criminal courts in the United States and the United Kingdom promotes a confrontational dynamic between competing attorneys that many have argued is detrimental to the pursuit of truth and justice. Of greatest concern are the questioning strategies used by attorneys—especially during cross-examination—which may be considered coercive, confusing and intimidating to witnesses. The literature suggests that these strategies not only affect the accuracy of witness testimony, but also alter the perception of fact-finders. Witnesses favorable to truth and justice may have both their testimony and credibility damaged by attorneys skilled in the art of language. This literature review questions the confounding effects of adversarial questioning strategies on truth and justice, and investigates whether the way in which witnesses are questioned in court ought to be revised.
Type: Dissertation
Level: Masters
Qualification: MSc
Description: The full text of this dissertation is available only to University of Leicester members. Please log in with your CFS username and password when prompted.
Appears in Collections:Masters' Dissertations, School of Psychology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Dieter Dissertation.pdf2.85 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.