Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||How will it work? A qualitative study of strategic stakeholders' accounts of a patient safety initiative|
Tarrant, Carolyn Clare
Suokas, Anu Kristiina
|Publisher:||BMJ Publishing Group|
|Citation:||BMJ Quality and Safety, 2010, 19 (1), pp. 74-78.|
|Abstract:||Objectives: Implementation of quality improvement programmes may suffer if the stakeholders involved do not share a common understanding of the theory of change or do not accept it as legitimate. We aimed to identify how strategic stakeholders understood and responded to the first phase of the Health Foundation's Safer Patients Initiative, a programme aimed at making hospitals safer for patients in the UK. Methods: Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with 60 strategic-level hospital stakeholders and with five stakeholders involved in commissioning, designing and introducing the initiative. Analysis was based on the constant comparative method. Results: The aims of the initiative were seen as legitimate and sound by most hospital stakeholders, and the theory of change was generally understood and accepted, but seven hospital stakeholders were unable to describe it. Although participants had specific doubts, particularly relating to feasibility of implementation and scientific legitimacy of some elements of the initiative, overall there was a broadly shared vision and commitment to the principles and practices associated with the theory of change, and considerable enthusiasm and optimism. Contestations about the legitimacy and relevance of the initiative among front-line staff, local resistance to changes that went against established norms, and resource and structural issues were, however, seen as potentially threatening to implementation. Conclusions: It is possible to get strategic-level individuals, even when widely dispersed, to understand and agree upon a theory of change that can be used in their organisations. These individuals are also able to recognise the contexts of negotiation in which programmes of change are enacted.|
|Description:||This paper was published as BMJ Quality and Safety, 2010, 19 (1), pp. 74-78. It is available from http://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/19/1.toc. DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2008.029504|
Metadata only entry
|Appears in Collections:||Published Articles, Dept. of Health Sciences|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.