Leicester Research Archive

Leicester Research Archive >
College of Medicine, Biological Sciences and Psychology >
Health Sciences, Department of >
Published Articles, Dept. of Health Sciences >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2381/9341

Title: Do research ethics committees identify process errors in applications for ethical approval?
Authors: Angell, Emma L.
Dixon-Woods, Mary
Issue Date: Feb-2009
Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group
Citation: Journal of Medical Ethics, 2009, 35 (2), pp. 130-132.
Abstract: We analysed research ethics committee (REC) letters. We found that RECs frequently identify process errors in applications from researchers that are not deemed “favourable” at first review. Errors include procedural violations (identified in 74% of all applications), missing information (68%), slip-ups (44%) and discrepancies (25%). Important questions arise about why the level of error identified by RECs is so high, and about how errors of different types should be handled.
ISSN: 0306-6800
Links: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.2008.025940
http://jme.bmj.com/content/35/2/130
http://hdl.handle.net/2381/9341
Type: Article
Description: This is the author’s final draft of the paper published as Journal of Medical Ethics, 2009, 35 (2), pp. 130-132. The final published version is available at http://jme.bmj.com/content/35/2/130. DOI: 10.1136/jme.2008.025940
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, Dept. of Health Sciences

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
2008_025940_angell for resubmission final.pdf172.94 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
View Statistics

Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

MAINTAINER