Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Psychological Evidence in South African Murder Trials
Authors: Colman, Andrew M.
First Published: Nov-1991
Publisher: The British Psychological Society
Citation: The Psychologist, 1991, 4 (11), pp. 482-486
Abstract: In two recent murder trials, South African courts have accepted basic processes of social psychology as extenuating factors. In the SARHWU murder trial, eight black railway workers pleaded guilty to the murder of four strike-breakers during a bitter industrial dispute. The argument for extenuation rested on situational factors operating at the time of the murders. Social psychologists testified about conformity, obedience to authority, group polarisation, frustration, relative deprivation, de-individuation, bystander apathy, and other psychological processes which may help to explain the conduct of the accused. The court accepted these factors as extenuating, but sentenced four of the eight to death. In the case of the “Queenstown Six”, township residents who had already been sentenced to death for the “necklace” killing of a young woman during a period of township unrest had their sentences set aside on a technicality. A retrial focussed on extenuating factors arising from crowd psychology, and all six had their death sentences reduced to 20 months’ imprisonment.
ISSN: 0952-8229
Version: Post-print
Type: Article
Rights: Copyright © The British Psychological Society, 1991.
Description: First published in The Psychologist, vol. 4 no. 11, 1991. Published by The British Psychological Society - see
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, School of Psychology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Psychological Evidence in SA Murder Trials.pdf61.09 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.